Note that this is one benchmark result so there could be some variance, but it is in line with what we expected. Single-core speed is up 16.7 percent, while multi-core speed is up 6.7 percent. The M3 Pro outperforms the M2 Pro, but not by a lot. Comparatively, the 16-inch MacBook Pro with M2 Pro chip that has a 12-core CPU and 19-core GPU earned a single core score of 2643 and a multi-core score of 14206. On Geekbench 6, the M3 Pro earned a single-core score of 3085 and a multi-core score of 15155. Dan's MacBook Pro is the 16-inch $2,499 version with a 12-core CPU, 18-core GPU, 18GB Unified Memory, and a 512GB SSD. For context, the M3 Pro has 150GB/s memory bandwidth, while the M2 Pro had 200GB/s.Īpple also tweaked the 12-core M3 Pro to have six performance cores and six efficiency cores rather than the eight performance cores and four efficiency cores the M2 Pro chip has, which will impact overall performance. Apple provided reviewers with new Macs equipped with M3 and M3 Max chips, but we've heard little about the new M3 Pro. Dan purchased the M3 Pro MacBook Pro, which is a model that hasn't gotten a lot of attention. Hopefully it won’t be too much longer to wait to find out if the M1X relies on Firestorm/Icestorm ( M1), Avalanche/Blizzard ( A15), or a whole new core designation.Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Interestingly, the same source opines that the M1X will be “based on the M1/A15 cores”, even though the M1 was itself based on the A14 chip. These scores would put the M1X way beyond the current scores listed for the Apple M1 in Geekbench’s Metal chart, with the 8-core GPU part recording an average benchmark of 21,168 points. Yuryev reckons the M1X with 16-core GPU could manage 46,240 points in Geekbench Metal while the 32-core GPU edition powers up to double of the former, at 92,480 points. The graphics performances for two variants of the M1X SoC are also quite astonishing. This should be expected, as it is M1-powered devices such as the Mac mini and MacBook Pro 13 that head that particular chart at the moment. The single-core prediction of 1,740 points also looks very healthy for the Apple M1X, putting it at the very top of the current Geekbench table for Mac devices. That latter very-expensive desktop (expect to pay at least US$7,999 for a 16-core model) is certainly no slouch, with Geekbench recording an average score of 14,596 points for the Intel Xeon W-3245 in this particular computer. The Geekbench multi-core score offered up by Yuryev stands at 15,070 points, which would put this particular hypothetical M1X-based device above the 16-core Mac Pro (Late 2019). Vadim Yuryev, co-host of the popular Max Tech YouTube channel, has had a go at predicting the synthetic benchmark performance of the M1X, and it certainly bodes well for the next-generation Apple Silicon. The Apple M1 has certainly managed to challenge the established hierarchy in the past, so it’s easy to see why greater performance should be offered by a more powerful successor. Regardless of the name of the SoC that should be powering the expected upcoming MacBook Pro 14 and MacBook Pro 16, many commenters are predicting that the so-called M1X will be an absolute beast of a processor. It should be noted from the offset that Apple hasn’t even confirmed the M1X chip yet, although there have been some signs pointing to its existence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |